Concurrent Cause Doctrine – 2
There would have been no need to create a concurrent cause doctrine if either the automobile or the homeowner’s policy had had a $1 million limit. The court would have applied its earlier stated rule of efficient proximate cause and found applicable the policy with the $1 million policy limit. This is not meant as a criticism of the court but it is, rather, recognition of the humanity of justices of the Supreme Court, who occasionally find themselves reasoning backward to what they perceive as a fair result.
The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.