Insurance 101 – Chapter 11 – Volume 90 – Limitation on Defense – 6

Limitation on Defense – 6

Starting around 1991 and thereafter, as a matter of law, judges often eliminated a bad faith claim if the insurer proffered a sufficient rationale (i.e., a genuine dispute, whether ultimately correct or not) regarding that insurer’s claim decision with respect to a legal issue relating to the availability of coverage.  This doctrine, invariably presented by means of a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, was later extended to a factual issue.

The following video was adapted from my book, “Insurance Claims A Comprehensive Guide” Published by the National Underwriter Company and is available at the Zalma Insurance Claims Library

Legal Disclaimer

The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *