More Restraint on Independent Counsel
[S]ince the total expense of this defense is to be assumed by the insurer under its promise to defend, we believe the engagement of an independent counsel to represent
the insured should be approved by the insurer. Such approval, however, should not be unreasonably withheld. Employer’s Fire Insurance Company v. Beals.
The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.