Insurance 101 – Chapter 7 – Volume 34 – The Regulation of Public Adjusters – 7

The Regulation of Public Adjusters – 7

Indiana has refused to accept PAs at all. In Professional Adjusters, Inc. v. Tandon, 433 N.E. 2d 779 (1982), the Supreme Court of Indiana found that the statute providing for licensing of certified PAs who could then undertake negotiation of settlements between insureds and insurers was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers clause, in that it permitted practice of law by persons not required to be admitted to the bar and not subject to discipline by the Supreme Court.

The following video was adapted from my book, “Insurance Claims A Comprehensive Guide” Published by the National Underwriter Company and is available at the Zalma Insurance Claims Library

Legal Disclaimer

The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.