Insurance 101 – Chapter 9 – Volume 59 – Unintended Consequences

 Unintended Consequences

In 1975 the Court of Appeals was faced with a similar problem and ruled, following Jefferson, that an insured was entitled only to minimal recovery because his destroyed dwelling had almost no market value at the time of the fire. Elliano v. Assurance Company of America, 45 Cal. App. 3d 170, 119 Cal. Rptr. 653 (1975). In Elliano, the litigant’s roles were reversed: Mr. Elliano, the insured, argued that he should be entitled to recover, as had Fong, the replacement cost of his dwelling, less physical depreciation; his insurer argued that Jefferson was dispositive of the issue, since “actual cash value is synonymous with fair market value.”

The following video was adapted from my book, “Insurance Claims A Comprehensive Guide” Published by the National Underwriter Company and is available at the Zalma Insurance Claims Library

Legal Disclaimer

The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.