Insurance 101 – Chapter 16 Volume 41 – More on Preponderance of Evidence

More on Preponderance of Evidence

In Ohio, the Court of Appeal reversed an insurance fraud verdict in favor of an insurer in Caserta v. Allstate Insurance Company, 14 Ohio App. 3d 167, 470 N.E. 2d 430 (1983), because a witness was allowed to testify who suggested that the insured had committed insurance fraud “[b]y inducing the pilot of an airplane to deliberately crash the plane, thereby destroying the airplane and costing the pilot his life.”

The following video was adapted from my book, “Insurance Claims A Comprehensive Guide” Published by the National Underwriter Company and is available at the Zalma Insurance Claims Library

Legal Disclaimer

The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.